Awake Tracheal Intubation
CA-3 · I.B.3.c.2 II.C.1.d.1.f.13 I.B.6.a.1
25Sources
6Kept
1Dropped
7 points
Awake tracheal intubation halved in frequency between 2014 and 2020, and in this single-centre cohort first-attempt success was higher with flexible bronchoscopy than videolaryngoscopy (84% versus 60%) — pooled randomised trials found no such difference.
PMID 36289151 — not confirmed against the abstract: The abstract states ATI use decreased by about 50%, not halved, and mentions the comparison between flexible bronchoscopy and video laryngoscopy success rates but does not mention pooled randomized trials.
dropped
Guidelines on awake tracheal intubation agree on the procedure itself and on confirming tube position, but conflict on indications and airway local anaesthesia, and only 3 of 7 were rated high quality.
PMID 39966725
kept
Awake intubation was used in about 1% of general anaesthetics and that rate did not fall over 12 years despite a large rise in videolaryngoscopy, with 2% of attempts failing.
PMID 25907462
kept
Videolaryngoscopy likely reduces rates of failed intubation compared to direct laryngoscopy (Macintosh-style RR=0.41, hyperangulated RR=0.51, channelled RR=0.43).
PMID 35820934
kept
Awake intubation took a median of 24 minutes from entering theatre against 16 minutes for intubation after induction, with a 1% failure rate and 1.6% complications — it costs time, not safety.
PMID 27111535
kept
For awake tracheal intubation, videolaryngoscopy shortened intubation time compared with flexible bronchoscopy and slightly reduced desaturation below 90%, with no difference in failure or first-attempt success.
PMID 38892899
kept
Optical stylets result in the shortest time to tracheal intubation compared to flexible bronchoscopes and videolaryngoscopes during awake tracheal intubation.
PMID 34303493
kept
Decks
Oral boards prompts for you
No module in the boards bank matches this topic yet.